School Building
|
School Bus
|
Students are grouped by age.
|
Students are in one large mixed-age
group.
|
Staff focused on students
|
Driver has to drive the bus.
|
External controls under adult
supervision can be effective.
|
External controls from school
don’t extend to bus.
|
Internal control not always necessary
|
Internal control only real
option
|
Most bullying is unnoticed by
adults.
|
Even easier to conceal than in
building
|
Purpose and importance of school
clear in students’ mind
|
Bus is a means to an end—something
to get you to school.
|
Many environmental options for behavior
change
|
Contained space with few options
|
Adults are adjacent to students.
|
Driver can be far away and
occupied driving the bus.
|
Timely response to behavior
possible
|
Response to behavior can be days
away
|
Traditional approaches to
behavioral management can work.
|
Traditional approaches are not
effective.
|
Bystanders can remove themselves
as an audience to the bullying.
|
Students who bully have a captive
audience on the bus.
|
Monday, July 23, 2012
Different Worlds
The school bus and the school building are completely different worlds yet we typically try to solve their problems in the same way. Solutions that work in the school building not only fail to work on the school bus but may even exacerbate the problems on the bus. Here is a chart comparing the two environments (taken from my forthcoming book: No Place for Bullying):
There are no off the shelf solutions to the problems on the bus. The only effective solutions will come from transportation staff and school staff working together to analyze the problems and develop creative solutions based investing time and energy to prevent as many problems as possible. Waiting until something happens and then providing some type of consequence is ultimately just damage control.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment